Track papers across labs, topics, and trends.
Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This study explores the uncertainty decomposition and explainability of a deep learning framework designed for gyroscope bias correction using a 1-D Convolutional Neural Network. The network predicts residual angular rate corrections while simultaneously estimating aleatoric and epistemic uncertainties, revealing that aleatoric uncertainty increases with perturbation intensity and that epistemic uncertainty effectively distinguishes between nominal and perturbed conditions. The findings highlight the complementary roles of these uncertainties in enhancing the reliability of hybrid learning-based state estimation systems, which is crucial for applications in aerospace and robotics.
Aleatoric and epistemic uncertainties in gyroscope bias correction reveal critical insights into system reliability under perturbations, with epistemic uncertainty proving more effective at distinguishing operational conditions.
This work investigates uncertainty decomposition and explainability in a deep learning-based framework for gyroscope bias correction. A 1-D Convolutional Neural Network is trained to predict residual angular rate corrections from multi-sensor inputs, including gyroscope and star tracker measurements. The bias corrections are sent to a flight-representative Gyro-Stellar Estimator. The network produces both mean corrections and input-dependent (heteroscedastic) aleatoric uncertainty, while epistemic uncertainty is estimated via an ensemble of independently trained models. The proposed approach is trained under nominal conditions and evaluated in both nominal and structured perturbations that include additive and temporally correlated noise. Gradient-based attribution methods are applied to both the correction and uncertainty outputs, enabling a decomposition of the evidence that drives state updates and uncertainty estimates. By aggregating attribution patterns across rotational axes and regimes, we reveal axis-specific behaviors and characterize how structured perturbations influence the collaboration between aleatoric and epistemic uncertainty. Uncertainty analysis shows that aleatoric uncertainty increases with perturbation intensity, but the distributions overlap and the calibration is not consistent across regimes. On the other hand, epistemic uncertainty gives a clear signal that gets clearer as the distributional shift happens, showing that the models disagree more. These results show that aleatoric and epistemic uncertainty work well together and that epistemic uncertainty is better at distinguishing between nominal and perturbed operating conditions. The results provide insight into the behavior of hybrid learning-based state estimation components and motivate the use of uncertainty for downstream monitoring and fault detection.