Track papers across labs, topics, and trends.
Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This study investigates the challenges faced by Arabic-speaking practitioners in designing data visualisations for right-to-left (RTL) scripts, highlighting the tension between Arabic reading conventions and universal left-to-right (LTR) visual norms. Through an evaluation of seven GUI-based visualisation tools and interviews with 11 practitioners, the research uncovers significant limitations in tool support, including issues with RTL mirroring and numeral rendering, which force practitioners to engage in labor-intensive workarounds. The findings underscore the need for more inclusive design practices that recognize the unique requirements of Arabic script users, ultimately impacting the effectiveness and accessibility of data visualisations in RTL contexts.
Arabic-speaking visualisation practitioners are forced to navigate a landscape of inadequate tools, often compromising their design choices due to systemic biases in visualisation practices.
Design guidelines and best practices serve as references that support designers throughout the visualisation design process. While considerable effort has identified the elements that contribute to effective data visualisations, little attention has been paid to how language (scripts and reading direction), tool support, and cultural context also shape design decisions. As a result, assumptions of homogeneity persist, with visualisation practices predominantly benefiting users of English and left-to-right (LTR) scripts while overlooking the needs of over two billion Arabic script users. We investigate how Arabic-speaking visualisation practitioners design for right-to-left (RTL) scripts. We report on an analytical evaluation of seven popular GUI-based visualisation authoring tools using an Arabic dataset complemented by interviews with 11 Arabic-speaking practitioners across journalism, design, and data analysis. Our findings reveal that visualisation practitioners constantly negotiate tensions between Arabic reading conventions,"universal"LTR visual norms, and limited tool support for Arabic text, Eastern numerals, and maps. They engage in substantial labour, such as manually mirroring charts, fixing alignment issues, and stitching together multi-tool workflows, while making strategic compromises in language choice, interactivity, and chart type. Our tool analysis further reveals fragmented, inconsistent support for RTL mirroring, poor numeral rendering, and map defaults that encode geopolitical assumptions. In light of these findings, we discuss how RTL visualisation work is carried out under many constraints that affect agency and creativity. We argue that visualisation tools and defaults operationalise linguistic and geopolitical power in RTL contexts, and offer research directions and design implications that more robustly support RTL practitioners.