Track papers across labs, topics, and trends.
Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces a computational ethical framework for AI-driven digital phenotyping, addressing the gap between high-level ethical principles and practical system verification. By formalizing ethical requirements as deontic temporal logic constraints and employing a conceptual ethical agent, the framework ensures that systems comply with specified ethical standards. A case study utilizing financial data related to mental health demonstrates the framework's logical consistency and its ability to rule out ethical violations through counterexample-based verification using the Z3 SMT solver.
Continuous machine-verifiable ethical checking could transform how we govern AI systems in sensitive domains like mental health.
Ethical governance of AI-driven systems is often expressed through high-level principles and static documentation, creating a gap between regulatory requirements and system-level verification. This challenge is particularly acute in digital phenotyping, where continuous behavioural data raises concerns around consent, privacy, and fairness. In this paper, we propose a computational ethical framework for AI-driven digital phenotyping system in which ethical requirements are formalised as deontic temporal logic constraints, alongside a conceptual ethical agent that oversees the system and ensures that any supervised system satisfies the specified constraints. Using a case study involving financial data and mental health, we model key ethical properties and verify them using the Z3 Satisfiability Modulo Theories (SMT) solver. Our evaluation shows that the framework is logically consistent and that violations of the specified ethical properties are ruled out within the formal model through counterexample-based verification. This presents early research enabling continuous, machine-verifiable ethical checking, moving beyond retrospective compliance based on static documentation. We discuss limitations, including the need for real-world verification with data, the challenge with subjectivity and contextual sensitivity, the need for human oversight, and outline how such approaches can support the development of digital phenotyping and AI systems with continuous and auditable ethical guarantees.