Track papers across labs, topics, and trends.
Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces CAGE, a two-stage framework designed to enhance the fidelity of inline citations in long-form question answering by addressing attribution ambiguity. By employing a Cognitive Map Induction Model to create answer-centered support subgraphs, CAGE effectively aligns semantic answer units with their corresponding documents, thereby reducing the risk of evidence-boundary overruns. Experimental results on ASQA, ELI5, and ExpertQA demonstrate that CAGE achieves state-of-the-art performance in citation generation, underscoring the importance of structured cognitive attribution in verifiable LLM outputs.
Inline citations can be both accurate and contextually relevant, as shown by CAGE's state-of-the-art performance in long-form question answering.
Long-form question answering increasingly relies on retrieved evidence to make LLM outputs verifiable, with inline citations tracing claims to source documents. However, existing systems often attach citations that are topically related but insufficient to support their claims. We identify attribution ambiguity as a structural challenge: end-to-end generation must implicitly resolve combinatorial claim--document assignments, obscuring evidential boundaries and increasing the risk of evidence-boundary overrun, where claims exceed cited support. To address this challenge, we propose CAGE (Cognitive Attribution Graphs for Citation Generation), a two-stage framework that introduces an explicit cognitive attribution map before answer generation. CAGE first trains a plug-and-play Cognitive Map Induction Model to construct answer-centered support subgraphs, aligning each semantic answer unit with supporting documents through explicit relations. A Structured Citation Reasoning Model then realizes these units as sentence-level claims with map-aligned citations. Experiments on ASQA, ELI5, and ExpertQA show that CAGE achieves state-of-the-art performance, demonstrating the effectiveness of attribution-space contraction and map-guided citation generation.