Track papers across labs, topics, and trends.
Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This study introduces Calibrated EcoTreeFuseNet-Plus, a novel tree-neural probability-fusion framework designed to enhance fine-grained vegetation community classification in heterogeneous landscapes. By integrating out-of-fold tree probabilities, EcoFuseNet-V2 outputs, and advanced calibration techniques, the model addresses critical issues such as stacking leakage and minority-class evaluation, achieving a balanced accuracy of 0.7903 and a macro F1-score of 0.7768 on a diverse dataset. The significant reduction in expected calibration error from 0.3866 to 0.0651 underscores the framework's effectiveness in providing reliable predictions while maintaining stability across repeated data splits.
Calibration techniques can dramatically improve the accuracy and reliability of fine-grained ecological classifications, achieving a macro F1-score of 0.7768 with a robust framework.
Accurate vegetation-community classification is essential for ecological monitoring, habitat assessment, and evidence-based environmental management in heterogeneous landscapes. Existing studies often rely on standalone tree ensembles or generic neural networks, although fine-grained ecological classes frequently exhibit overlapping spectral, topographic, and structural characteristics. Many frameworks also provide limited protection against stacking leakage, insufficient probability calibration, weak minority-class evaluation, and little evidence of stability across repeated data splits. To address these limitations, this study proposes Calibrated EcoTreeFuseNet-Plus, a tree-neural probability-fusion framework that combines out-of-fold tree probabilities, EcoFuseNet-V2 outputs, validation-selected meta-learning, and post-hoc temperature scaling. Raster values from six LiDAR-derived terrain and canopy variables and two hyperspectral vegetation indices were extracted at coordinate-based reference locations. Quality control removed 26 samples with missing elevation and one sample with non-finite NDWI, producing 1,833 complete records across 29 vegetation and non-vegetation classes. On the held-out test set, the proposed model achieved an accuracy of 0.8000, a macro F1-score of 0.7768, a balanced accuracy of 0.7903, and an MCC of 0.7903. Calibration reduced the expected calibration error from 0.3866 to 0.0651 without changing class predictions. Five-seed evaluation yielded a macro F1-score of 0.7717 +/- 0.0112, indicating stable performance across repeated splits. The results demonstrate a reliable discrimination-calibration trade-off for small-sample, fine-grained ecological classification.