Track papers across labs, topics, and trends.
Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper evaluates the performance of Mercury, a specialized Clinical Quality Language (CQL) database engine, against Blaze, a leading CQL evaluator, using a benchmark suite on a large synthetic patient dataset. The authors highlight how Mercury's architecture, which computes composite scores externally while retaining individual record evaluations, enhances transparency and usability in clinical decision support and quality measurement. The results demonstrate that Mercury significantly outperforms Blaze in terms of efficiency and scalability, making it a promising solution for clinical quality assessments.
Mercury's innovative architecture allows for unprecedented transparency in clinical evaluations, outperforming Blaze by efficiently handling composite scoring while retaining detailed record-level insights.
Clinical Quality Language (CQL) engines serve two axes: decision support (evaluate one patient, now) and quality measurement (score a population). The composite score is rarely the end product, because the individual determinations behind it are what let a score be inspected, attributed, and acted on. Two architectures follow from where aggregation happens: one computes the composite inside the engine over the whole store (no data movement); the other evaluates individual records and lets the composite be totaled externally, keeping every intermediate available. Mercury is a purpose-built CQL database engine of the second kind. It treats CQL evaluation as a database problem -- FHIR stored in a compact binary encoding keyed patient-first, indexes derived from what CQL retrieves filter on, a planner selecting access paths, CQL as the query language -- rather than as in-memory interpretation over a generic FHIR store. We evaluate Mercury 2.0.1 against Blaze 1.10.1, among the fastest CQL evaluators, using Blaze's own published benchmark suite on identical AWS hardware over a 100,000-patient Synthea corpus (112.3M resources).