Track papers across labs, topics, and trends.
Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper evaluates the effectiveness of two implementation approaches—transcript-based and tool-based—for integrating safeguards in speech-to-speech (S2S) conversational assistants within automotive applications. The study reveals that both methods face significant limitations, including unacceptable latency and technical challenges that hinder their viability for industrial use. Ultimately, the findings highlight critical open challenges in developing effective guardrails for S2S systems in real-world settings.
Latency issues in S2S conversational assistants could delay responses by up to 1.4 seconds, rendering current safeguard methods impractical for automotive applications.
Recent advances have introduced speech-to-speech (S2S) conversational assistants capable of producing natural-sounding interactions, including non-verbal cues like tonality and mood. In the automotive domain, this enables intuitive and humanlike in-car dialogue experiences. However, integrating these end-to-end assistants limits architectural options for programmable domain-specific safeguards. This paper discusses two implementation approaches for S2S guardrails: transcript-based and tool-based. Through an empirical evaluation, we demonstrate that both strategies are insufficient for industrial deployment in most cases due to prohibitive latency (delaying each answer by 0 to 1.4 seconds even for computationally cheap checks) and technical impediments (like potentially non-deterministic tool call behavior). Finally, we outline open challenges for S2S guardrails in the automotive context.