Track papers across labs, topics, and trends.
Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This study evaluates the advancements in generative models for creating pastiches of contemporary artworks by analyzing stylistic similarities between AI-generated images and original pieces from twelve artists. Using five computer vision models to assess various features, the research reveals that the latest model demonstrates improved semantic alignment and diversity in its outputs, although it underperforms in shallow features like color and texture. The results underscore the multidimensional nature of artistic style, supported by qualitative feedback from the artists involved in the evaluation process.
New generative models are not only producing more semantically aligned art pastiches but also revealing the complex, multidimensional nature of artistic style.
The aim of this paper is twofold. First, it investigates whether newer generative models are getting better at pastiching contemporary artworks. Second, it explores the consistency of the multidimensional nature of stylistic evaluation across different LLMs. Building on previous work, we analyze stylistic similarity between AI generated pastiches and the original artworks of twelve contemporary artists. We used five complementary computer vision models to capture texture, color, semantics, composition, and perceptual features through cosine distance in high-dimensional embedding spaces. The distances obtained show that the newer image generation model that we used has produced pastiches with improved semantic alignment and greater diversity than the model used in previous work. However, it was slightly less performant on shallow features such as color, texture, and perceptual adherence. Our findings confirm that artistic style is inherently multidimensional, and measuring it does not depend on any spatial architecture. These quantitative findings are contextualized through feedback from human evaluators, which are the artists themselves.