Track papers across labs, topics, and trends.
Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This study compares the effectiveness of language-specific versus cross-lingual knowledge graphs (KGs) for implicit aspect identification in Arabic within a hybrid pipeline. By evaluating both a native Arabic KG and a mature English KG across three benchmarks, the authors find that the Arabic KG significantly outperforms the English KG, achieving a micro-F1 score improvement of +0.199 on M-ABSA and +0.251 on SemEval-2016. Additionally, task-specific fine-tuning of an 8B-parameter large language model enhances explicit extraction performance, demonstrating that adaptation strategies are more critical than model size in this context.
Native Arabic knowledge graphs outperform English counterparts in implicit aspect identification, highlighting the importance of language-specific resources.
Aspect-based sentiment analysis (ABSA) in Arabic must recover both explicitly stated aspects and implicit aspects that are never named in the text. Implicit identification typically relies on an auxiliary knowledge source (e.g., a knowledge graph (KG)) linking opinion cues to aspect categories, but for a lower-resource language the practitioner faces a design choice: reuse a mature English KG through multilingual embeddings, or build a smaller native Arabic KG. This paper reports a controlled comparison of the two strategies within a single hybrid pipeline, evaluated on three Arabic benchmarks (M-ABSA, SemEval-2016 Arabic, and HAAD). We further compare two adaptation strategies for the generative extractor that feeds the KG -- zero-shot prompting versus task-specific fine-tuning of an 8B-parameter large language model (LLM). The native Arabic KG (Strategy 2) outperforms the cross-lingual English KG (Strategy 1) by +0.199 micro-F1 on M-ABSA and +0.251 on SemEval-2016, gaining on both precision and recall. Task-specific fine-tuning raises explicit-extraction micro-F1 from<= 0.13 (zero-shot) to 0.66-0.76 on M-ABSA and SemEval-2016 (0.45 on the smaller HAAD), confirming that task adaptation, rather than model scale, is decisive in a morphologically rich language.