Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This study automates the extraction of quantitative data from 76,000 energy system studies, addressing the challenges of sourcing and auditing assumptions that underpin energy models. By compiling 3.2 million structured data points and 20 million metadata entries, the authors create a FAIR database that enhances transparency and allows for comprehensive analysis of the energy systems literature. The findings reveal significant divergences between academic assumptions and empirical data, highlighting variations in research priorities across technologies and regions over time.
Automated extraction reveals that academic assumptions often diverge significantly from real-world data, reshaping our understanding of energy system modeling.
Energy system models guide societally important decisions, but their credibility rests on quantitative assumptions that are difficult to source and audit. Meta-analyses can improve transparency and modeling practices, but the rapid growth of publications makes manual information extraction increasingly impractical. Consequently, databases are updated infrequently and efforts are often duplicated across research groups. Here, we demonstrate the highly accurate automated extraction of quantitative information from 76,000 energy system studies published since 2010. We compile 3.2 million structured quantitative data points together with 20 million associated metadata entries, spanning a broad spectrum of technologies, methodological approaches and system characteristics. Beyond providing input data for models, the resulting FAIR database make the energy systems literature itself analysable. We show where academic assumptions diverge from empirical observed data, and how research priorities vary at scale across technologies, regions and time. To facilitate broad use within the community, the database is provided through an interactive dashboard, enabling users to filter, analyse and download data according to their specific research needs.