Track papers across labs, topics, and trends.
Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This study conducts a large-scale audit of AI-generated news summaries from three leading browsers—Google Chrome, Microsoft Edge, and Perplexity Comet—analyzing 41,331 summaries derived from 13,777 articles across 15 U.S. news outlets. The results reveal that these AI summarizers maintain broad factual accuracy while significantly reducing political bias and negative emotional tone in the news content. This transformation enhances clarity and mitigates partisan language, positioning AI-powered browsers as influential editorial intermediaries in shaping public discourse.
AI-powered browsers not only summarize news accurately but also significantly reduce political bias and negativity, reshaping how information is consumed.
Web browsers now provide AI-generated news summaries for millions of users. Despite their popularity and influence, we lack a systematic understanding of how these systems transform news before people read it. Through a large-scale audit, we investigate the factual accuracy of browser-based AI summarizers and how they alter the political bias, negative affect, and journalistic writing quality of news. Drawing on 13,777 articles from 15 U.S. news outlets, we evaluate their 41,331 summaries generated by three leading AI-powered browsers: Google Chrome (Gemini), Microsoft Edge (Copilot), and Perplexity Comet. We find that browser-based AI summarizers are broadly accurate. Furthermore, they consistently transform news by attenuating ideological bias, partisan stances, negativity, anger, and fear, while increasing clarity and reducing personal tone. With some variations, these patterns hold across browsers, outlet ideologies, and topics. Our findings identify AI-powered browsers as a new class of editorial intermediaries that systematically reshape news, with implications for democratic discourse and AI governance.