Track papers across labs, topics, and trends.
Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper argues that Generative AI is not a novel disruption but rather a continuation of historical trends in generative arts, revealing how contemporary debates on authorship and creativity echo past practices. It introduces a taxonomy of generative systems categorized as medium, artwork, or instrument, emphasizing that creative agency is distributed among human participants rather than residing solely within the algorithm. The study identifies systemic risks associated with creative automation, such as cognitive atrophy and Model Collapse, while proposing environmental enrichment as a potential remedy to these challenges.
Creativity in the generative era is not just about algorithms; it's a complex interplay of human agency and historical context that reshapes our understanding of authorship.
This paper frames Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) not as an unprecedented technological rupture, but as an industrial-scale manifestation of a deeply rooted historical process. Through a genealogy of generative arts, it shows how AI's questions on authorship and creativity have precise historical precedents. A taxonomy of generative systems is proposed across three functional categories (medium, artwork, instrument), the attribution of which is editorial rather than ontological. From individual cognitive atrophy to Model Collapse, the systemic risks of creative automation are identified; environmental enrichment is proposed as an antidote. The role of the artist undergoes a radical metamorphosis: from craftsman of the object to entropic agent, systems designer, explorer, and negentropic curator. This pipeline-based taxonomy rests on a specific premise: the algorithmic system remains medium, instrument, or artwork, while creative agency resides in the humans distributed along it. Algorithmic Repetition is introduced as the aesthetic degeneration of aligned generative systems; the Benjaminian aura does not dissolve in the generative era but condenses upon the productive system. Manifestation is proposed as a third ontological status for generative works, transcending the dichotomy between original and copy. To support the proposed theses, two complementary aspects are examined: the radicalization of distributed authorship; and the reevaluation of older generative models, whose instability constitutes an aesthetic degree of freedom lost by recent ones.