Track papers across labs, topics, and trends.
Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This study introduces GeneSpeak-FP, a Transformer retrieval model designed to identify annotated targets and compounds based on observed transcriptional responses from large-scale single-cell perturbation atlases. By utilizing cell-level perturbation signatures and training with supervised target losses, the model achieved notable retrieval performance, with Recall@10 reaching 0.408 and Recall@20 at 0.544 across a dataset of drug-cell-line pairs. The findings highlight the model's ability to effectively recover both target annotations and compound identities, underscoring its potential utility in drug discovery and personalized medicine.
GeneSpeak-FP achieves a remarkable 40.8% target retrieval rate, showcasing the power of single-cell perturbation signatures in drug-target identification.
Large-scale single-cell perturbation atlases make it possible to ask an inverse question: given an observed transcriptional response, which annotated targets and compounds in a fixed library are most consistent with that response? We present \model, a Transformer retrieval model for this closed-library setting. Each input is a cell-level perturbation signature formed by contrasting one treated cell with a cell-line-specific mean DMSO reference. The encoder maps the signature to a target-retrieval vector and a molecular-embedding vector, trained jointly with supervised target losses and structure--transcriptome alignment. We evaluate on Tahoe-100M conditions with mapped target annotations using a within-compound stratified 90/10 condition-pair split of 10,505 training and 1,168 validation drug--cell-line pairs. Because compounds and cell lines can occur in both partitions, the experiment measures held-out condition-pair retrieval rather than generalization to unseen compounds or cellular contexts. In a Monte Carlo evaluation over 38,400 sampled validation cells, \model\ achieved target Recall@10 of 0.408 and Recall@20 of 0.544, together with compound Hit@1 of 0.129, Hit@10 of 0.343, and mean reciprocal rank of 0.205 over a 379-compound bank. A separate diagnostic evaluation produced nearly identical values for the main model and large gains over a random-vector control and post-hoc bag-of-genes controls. These results demonstrate that a single multi-task model can recover both mapped target annotations and recorded compound identities from observed cell-level responses in the evaluated Tahoe-100M closed-library setting. Generalization to unseen compounds and cellular contexts remains to be established.