Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
The paper introduces teLLMe, a novel system for exploratory causal analysis of urban driving data that leverages structured event tables and causal structure learning. By integrating the PC algorithm with bootstrap-based stability checks and linear regression, teLLMe allows users to pose natural-language questions about traffic dynamics and receive structured causal insights. Case studies demonstrate its effectiveness in identifying plausible causal relationships, such as the impact of weather on traffic density, while emphasizing the importance of uncertainty and modeling choices in causal inference.
teLLMe reveals how natural-language queries can unlock causal insights from urban driving data, transforming observational traffic analysis into a structured exploration of causal relationships.
Traffic agencies now have access to large volumes of video-derived data for studying safety and congestion. Most of these data are observational and collected without interventions, which makes causal questions such as"How would rain change traffic density?"difficult to answer. We present teLLMe, a system for exploratory causal analysis of urban driving datasets. The system starts from a structured event table built from dashcam annotations and combines causal structure learning with the PC algorithm, bootstrap-based stability checks, and query-specific effect estimation using linear regression and DoWhy. Natural-language questions are mapped to structured causal queries through a schema-aware LLM, enabling users to specify treatments, outcomes, and subpopulations. teLLMe returns a"Causal Card"that summarizes effect estimates, adjustment sets, DAG support, and assumptions, followed by a short natural-language explanation. Case studies on BDD-derived traffic events show that the system can surface plausible relationships involving weather, peak hours, and traffic density, while making uncertainty and modeling choices explicit. The system is designed as a tool for hypothesis generation and expert reasoning rather than a source of definitive causal claims.