Track papers across labs, topics, and trends.
Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces a novel perspective on uncertainty quantification (UQ) by framing uncertainty measures as consequences of higher-level modeling decisions rather than primitives. The authors demonstrate how epistemic and aleatoric uncertainties can be derived through the decomposition of subjective risk using strictly proper loss functions, with reverse cross-entropy serving as a key example. This approach not only unifies various existing UQ measures under a common theoretical framework but also lays the groundwork for a learning-theoretic framework that connects subjective risk to concepts like excess risk and estimation error.
Subjective risk decomposition reveals a unified theoretical foundation for uncertainty measures, bridging gaps in existing UQ literature.
We present a novel viewpoint for uncertainty quantification. Uncertainty measures are not primitives, in need of axioms and argumentation, but instead consequences, of higher-level modelling decisions. We show how epistemic and aleatoric uncertainty measures can be derived via decomposition of a subjective risk, based on a strictly proper loss. Reverse cross-entropy provides a prominent example, where decomposition recovers the classic information-theoretic uncertainty terms. The same approach recovers numerous measures previously proposed across the UQ literature, providing them a common theoretical foundation. From a practical point of view, this suggests a new approach to UQ: given a modelling scenario and strictly proper loss, the corresponding epistemic and aleatoric terms are induced by the subjective-risk decomposition. We then extend our view to learning theory: we introduce and analyse subjective risk analogues of excess risk, approximation error, and estimation error, and identify the connections to UQ. We consider this a first step towards a full learning-theoretic framework for uncertainty quantification.