Track papers across labs, topics, and trends.
Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This study analyzes platform choice and user behavior among AI assistant users in the U.S., revealing that while ChatGPT dominates the market, smaller platforms like Claude effectively capture specific task niches. Trust in these platforms is primarily built through user experience rather than brand reputation, with Claude rated as the most trustworthy assistant despite its smaller user base. Additionally, privacy concerns are prevalent, but users are willing to pay significantly to ensure human oversight in sensitive tasks, indicating a complex relationship between trust, platform choice, and privacy preferences.
Users prioritize hands-on experience over brand reputation when assessing trust in AI assistants, with Claude emerging as the most trusted despite its smaller market share.
We study how a representative sample of United States adult AI-assistant users (n=1,999; June 2026) choose among platforms, allocate tasks across them, evaluate provider trustworthiness, and value data-handling features. Estimates are weighted to the AI-user population using external adoption benchmarks. Four patterns emerge. The market is concentrated but internally differentiated: ChatGPT is the primary assistant for 58% of users and Gemini for 25%, yet smaller platforms hold defensible task niches--Claude captures a third of coding tasks despite a 7% overall share. Task allocation is thus organized by platform far more than by user, and technical use falls steeply with age. Trust is earned through use rather than reputation: Claude is ranked most trustworthy in every head-to-head among users of both platforms, and shows by far the largest gap between how its users and non-users rate it. Finally, privacy concern is near-universal but action is gated by knowledge, not concern; in a choice experiment users pay most to keep humans--not models--out of their conversations ($11.20/month), with valuations rising in task sensitivity.