Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper explores causal inference in sequential observational settings where outcomes are influenced by interference and latent confounding, modeled through an Ising framework. The authors introduce a Maximum Pseudo-Likelihood Estimation (MPLE) approach to efficiently estimate model parameters, ensuring non-asymptotic consistency for causal quantity estimation. Their method is validated through synthetic experiments and a real-world analysis of the impact of vaccination rates on COVID-19 mortality across US counties, revealing significant causal insights.
Causal inference in sequential settings reveals how vaccination rates significantly affect COVID-19 death rates, challenging conventional understanding of public health interventions.
We study causal inference under outcome interference for sequential, observational settings. Specifically, we consider settings where the binary outcomes over N units are Markovian across T time steps. At each time step, the outcomes of N units have dependencies captured through an Ising model; each outcome is also impacted through an external field capturing the effects of its treatment as well as latent confounders. Similar to panel data literature, these latent confounders are modeled to have a low-rank factor structure. Our data is a single sample from this high-dimensional distribution. To estimate causal quantities of interest, we provide a computationally efficient method based on Maximum Pseudo-Likelihood Estimation (MPLE) for learning the model parameters. Under mild assumptions, we establish non-asymptotic consistency for parameter estimation and show this translates to faithful estimation of causal quantities of interest after sampling from the learned model. We demonstrate the efficacy of the method through synthetic experiments as well as a real-world case-study investigating causal effects of vaccine rates on COVID-19 death rates within US counties nationwide.