Track papers across labs, topics, and trends.
Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This study explores the ability of large language models (LLMs) to replicate human behavioral biases in route choice, leveraging cumulative prospect theory (CPT) as a benchmark. By developing a behavioral evaluation framework, the authors systematically compare LLM-generated decisions to established human patterns, revealing that LLMs can effectively reproduce non-rational biases associated with CPT. The results suggest that LLMs could serve as a scalable alternative for modeling human decision-making processes, potentially transforming agent-based simulations and behavioral research.
LLMs can mimic complex human decision biases, offering a novel approach to scalable behavioral modeling that traditional methods struggle to achieve.
Human choice behavior, including route choice, exhibits systematic behavioral biases that deviate from the assumptions of full rationality. Cumulative prospect theory (CPT) has been widely recognized as an effective framework for characterizing such behavioral patterns. However, its large-scale application, particularly in simulation and agent-based modeling, critically depends on specifying individual-level CPT parameters, which remain a major bottleneck. Conventional approaches typically rely on surveys and controlled experiments to calibrate CPT parameters, yet these methods are difficult to generalize and often fail to capture the full diversity of human decision-making. To address this challenge, this paper investigates whether large language models (LLMs) can reproduce human behavioral biases in choice-making without explicit specification of prospect-theoretic parameters. Using route choice as a representative scenario, we design a behavioral evaluation framework and systematically compare LLM-generated decisions with established human behavioral patterns predicted by CPT. Experimental results demonstrate that LLMs are capable of reproducing non-rational human choice biases and can exhibit decision behaviors consistent with prospect-theoretic effects under uncertainty. These findings suggest that generative AI models may provide a scalable alternative for modeling human decision processes and offer a promising foundation for next-generation large-scale agent-based simulation and AI-driven behavioral research.