Track papers across labs, topics, and trends.
Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This study investigates the perceptions of software developers regarding non-inclusive terminology in software artifacts, focusing on its impact on team dynamics and individual well-being. Through a survey of 1,517 open-source contributors, the research reveals that while the overall negative impact of such terminology is low, significant variations exist across demographic groups, with women and non-binary individuals reporting greater negative effects. The findings highlight the importance of inclusive language in fostering a sense of belonging and improving workplace experiences for underrepresented groups in tech.
Non-binary developers experience a disproportionately higher negative impact from non-inclusive terminology, revealing critical insights into workplace dynamics in tech.
Terminology such as "whitelist/blacklist," "master/slave," "man-hours," or "dummy value" has long been part of the technical vocabulary used in software artifacts, including source code, version histories, and documentation. In recent years, however, many of these expressions have been recognized as potentially non-inclusive and unwelcoming to groups historically underrepresented in software development, such as people of color, women, and individuals with disabilities. Consequently, a growing movement within the software industry has sought to replace these terms with more inclusive alternatives. Despite these initiatives, little is empirically known about how software developers perceive such terminology or how its continued use may influence their professional experiences and sense of belonging. This paper addresses the knowledge gap by examining how software developers perceive non-inclusive terminology in software and its perceived impact on team dynamics, productivity, belonging, and well-being. We surveyed open-source contributors and received 1,517 responses, of which 1,212 were complete and analyzed. On average, respondents reported low negative workplace impact overall; however, perceptions and impacts varied by demographic group. Women and non-binary participants, as well as respondents residing in the United States, were more likely to view the terms as non-inclusive. Among those who considered the terminology non-inclusive, non-binary participants reported higher overall negative impacts than male respondents, and female participants reported higher impact specifically on their sense of belonging.