Track papers across labs, topics, and trends.
Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This study applies a machine-learning pipeline to the Open Khipu Repository, analyzing 619 khipus to uncover structural patterns and provenance classifications. By engineering 27 structural features and employing unsupervised clustering and supervised classification methods, the authors identify three distinct khipu groups and achieve an F1 score of 0.86 for classifying imperial styles. Notably, the research reveals that colonial practices are reflected in the khipus' structure and validates previous findings regarding the Santa Valley khipus, demonstrating the potential of computational methods in archaeological research.
Colonial acquisition practices are structurally encoded in Inka khipus, revealing insights into their historical context through machine learning.
Khipus -- knotted cord devices -- were the primary recording medium of the Inka Empire (c. 1400-1532 CE), yet their system remains undeciphered. We present a reproducible machine-learning pipeline applied to the Open Khipu Repository (OKR), a public database of 619 khipus comprising 54,403 cords and 110,677 knots. We engineer 27 structural features per khipu and apply (i) unsupervised clustering via UMAP and HDBSCAN, recovering three structurally distinct groups (silhouette = 0.769); (ii) supervised provenance classification via gradient boosting, reaching F1 = 0.86 for the Inka Late Horizon imperial style; and (iii) SHAP-based interpretability, which identifies cord twist direction as the dominant structural discriminator of imperial khipus. We further report two findings of methodological interest. First, one cluster is dominated not by a geographic region but by nineteenth-century European museum collections, indicating that colonial acquisition and recording practices are structurally encoded in the corpus. Second, we provide an independent computational verification of the recto/verso (moiety) structure of the six Santa Valley khipus reported by Medrano and Urton (2018), reproducing both the aggregate attachment ratio and the identification of the single mixed specimen--using only the public OKR database, without physical access to the objects. We additionally report a negative result: knot-type sequence order, encoded as n-grams, adds no provenance signal beyond aggregate features. All code and data are openly available.