Track papers across labs, topics, and trends.
Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This study investigates the effectiveness of various learned preprocessing pipelines for detecting musculoskeletal abnormalities in elbow radiographs from the MURA dataset, focusing on patient-level evaluation under a leakage-aware framework. The researchers compared the performance of these pipelines, including a lightweight DnCNN module, against a DenseNet121 baseline using metrics such as AUROC and calibration scores. Findings indicate that while some preprocessing strategies can reduce calibration error, they do not consistently outperform the raw-input DenseNet121 model, highlighting the modest and configuration-dependent nature of preprocessing gains in this context.
Preprocessing strategies for elbow radiograph analysis show only modest improvements, with no clear advantage over a raw DenseNet121 baseline.
In this study, we examine learned preprocessing pipelines in the context of triage-oriented orthopedic abnormality detection task using elbow radiographs from MURA dataset. The evaluation focuses on patient-level detection of musculoskeletal abnormalities under a leakage-aware protocol. We compare multiple preprocessing pipelines, with and without a lightweight DnCNN module as a learned preprocessing component, to assess their impact on discrimination and calibration. Performance is assessed using discrimination metrics (AUROC, PR-AUC), calibration measures (ECE, Brier score), and validation-selected operating point analysis targeting high specificity. Results show that differences across preprocessing strategies are modest and configuration-dependent, with no consistent discrimination advantage over the raw-input DenseNet121 baseline. The raw and diverse inputs combined with the DnCNN front-end showed reduced ECE and Brier score, while CLAHE combined with DnCNN did not improve calibration. Overall, the results suggest that under patient-level evaluation, preprocessing gains are modest and configuration-dependent; the raw-input DenseNet121 baseline remains competitive throughout, and no tested preprocessing strategy produced a consistent discrimination advantage across all metrics.