Track papers across labs, topics, and trends.
Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This study investigates the necessity of supervised fine-tuning for Turkish sentiment analysis by comparing classical machine learning methods, fine-tuned pretrained models, and prompted large language models on an e-commerce review dataset. The results reveal that fine-tuned BERTurk models consistently outperform prompted large language models, particularly in the challenging three-class sentiment classification task, where the neutral class is notably difficult. These findings indicate that prompted models struggle with nuanced sentiment distinctions, emphasizing the continued importance of fine-tuning in achieving robust performance in Turkish sentiment analysis.
Fine-tuned BERTurk models outperform prompted large language models in Turkish sentiment analysis, especially when distinguishing subtle neutral sentiments.
This study examines whether supervised fine-tuning remains necessary for Turkish sentiment analysis in the era of large language models. We compare classical machine learning methods, fine-tuned pretrained language models, and prompted large language models on a Turkish e-commerce review dataset with negative, neutral, and positive labels. Fine-tuned BERTurk models perform best overall and outperform all prompted large language models in the full three-class task. The neutral class emerges as the main difficulty: while several large language models are much more competitive in binary positive--negative classification, they degrade substantially in the three-class setting by collapsing neutral reviews into polarized categories. The findings suggest that, in realistic Turkish sentiment classification, prompted large language models do not yet match supervised fine-tuning in the zero-shot setting, and that including the neutral class is crucial for robust evaluation.