Track papers across labs, topics, and trends.
Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces a governance model for autonomous AI systems that emphasizes institutional attestation over direct monitoring of agent reasoning. By requiring independently attested evidence for high-risk actions, the model allows AI agents to retain autonomy in planning while ensuring that execution is contingent on verifiable preconditions. The proposed approach is illustrated through a proof-of-concept implementation, demonstrating its applicability in critical domains such as clinical prescribing and software deployment.
Autonomous AI agents can retain their decision-making autonomy while ensuring accountability through a novel governance model that requires independent attestation for high-risk actions.
Autonomous AI agents may begin to perform consequential, irreversible actions such as clinical prescribing and production software deployment. This paper observes that human institutions have governed powerful autonomous actors not by monitoring their reasoning but by requiring independently attested evidence at the point of consequential action. We formalise this institutional pattern as a computational governance model for AI agent systems. Under the proposed model, an agent retains full autonomy over planning and reasoning but holds no execution authority over designated high-risk actions. Execution is conditional on preconditions that are each independently attested by a separate authoritative source, cryptographically bound to a declared intent, and evaluated by a deterministic policy. Decisions are recorded in a tamper-evident log amenable to independent re-verification. We present a proof-of-concept implementation and illustrate the model with examples from software deployment and clinical prescribing.