Track papers across labs, topics, and trends.
Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This study analyzes sentiment polarity biases in AI models by examining how different architectures classify product reviews across various languages. It finds that large language models exhibit a negative bias in French, showing higher accuracy for negative reviews, while encoder models demonstrate a positive bias in Japanese, failing to identify negative reviews that employ indirect criticism. These findings highlight significant discrepancies in sentiment analysis performance based on language and model type, which could impact applications in multilingual contexts.
Large language models misclassify sentiment in French, favoring negative reviews, while encoder models in Japanese overlook critical negative feedback due to a positive bias.
This study investigates sentiment polarity biases, specifically, differences in how accurately AI models classify positive versus negative reviews across languages and model architectures. Large language models show a negative bias in French and are more accurate on negative reviews, while encoder models exhibit positive bias in Japanese, missing negative reviews that use indirect criticism. These language-specific polarity biases have implications in both social and business domains deploying multilingual sentiment analysis systems.