Track papers across labs, topics, and trends.
Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces the Meaning Intelligence Framework (MIF), a comprehensive nine-dimension schema designed to enhance the understanding of Nigerian public discourse by distinguishing between surface sentiment and true communicative intent. The authors identify a critical failure in existing AI systems: the inability to grasp context, which leads to misinterpretation of utterances based on speaker and audience dynamics. By evaluating a frontier language model using the MIF, they demonstrate a significant improvement in register classification accuracy from 33.3% to 73.3% when employing schema-informed prompting, highlighting the framework's effectiveness in capturing nuanced meaning in communication.
Register classification accuracy jumps from 33.3% to 73.3% with the introduction of a new framework that decodes the complexities of Nigerian public discourse.
We introduce the Meaning Intelligence Framework (MIF), a nine-dimension annotation and evaluation schema for Nigerian public discourse that separates surface sentiment from true communicative intent. Existing benchmarks for Nigerian languages, including NaijaSenti and AfriSenti, treat sentiment classification as a three-way polarity task (positive, negative, neutral). We argue that the dominant failure mode of AI systems on Nigerian discourse is not translation failure but context failure: the same utterance carries opposite pragmatic force depending on speaker, audience, and situation. The MIF operationalises this insight across nine scored dimensions: register, surface sentiment, true intent, irony, coded subtext, risk tier, annotator confidence, speaker emotion, and recommended communications action. We construct a 30-item calibration dataset spanning Standard English, Nigerian English, Nigerian Pidgin, and code-mixed registers, and evaluate a frontier language model (Gemini 2.5 Flash) under zero-shot and schema-informed prompting conditions. The headline finding is the Register Gap: zero-shot register classification accuracy is 33.3%, rising to 73.3% (+40 points) when the model receives the MIF schema in-context. The composite Meaning Intelligence Score increases by 5.4 points (73.2 to 78.6) under schema-informed prompting, with the largest practical gains in register identification, coded-subtext detection (+10 points), and strategic action recommendation (+10.3 points). We release the framework specification, annotation guidelines, and the 30-item public calibration set to support reproducibility, while retaining a private holdout corpus for contamination-protected evaluation.