Track papers across labs, topics, and trends.
Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This chapter investigates the role of Large Language Models (LLMs) in enhancing democratic deliberation by focusing on inclusivity and empowerment for marginalized groups. It critiques existing red teaming strategies while exploring how systemic-functional linguistics can inform the design of AI-driven deliberation tools that mitigate biases and enhance participation. Key findings suggest that while LLMs can democratize discourse, there is a critical need for ethical safeguards to prevent the reinforcement of existing linguistic inequalities.
LLMs could transform democratic deliberation, but without careful design, they risk entrenching linguistic biases rather than dismantling them.
The increasing prominence of Large Language Models (LLMs) in public discourse presents both opportunities and challenges for democratic deliberation. While red teaming strategies help mitigate specific risks, broader concerns persist regarding linguistic constraints, biases, and the sycophantic tendencies of LLMs. This chapter explores how LLMs can be used to significantly scale up and democratise deliberation, particularly in fostering inclusivity and empowering traditionally marginalised groups. Drawing on concepts from Systemic-Functional Linguistics, the chapter examines how variations across language users (for example, with respect to socio-demographic groups) and across language use (for example, with respect to communicative functions) shape participation in AI-supported deliberation. The chapter presents AI-driven deliberation studies and assesses their potential to scaffold argumentation, enhance access, and reduce the influence of exclusionary linguistic norms and biases which are embedded in prestigious registers. At the same time, the chapter cautions against both overclaiming, which leads to unrealistic expectations, and underclaiming, which risks missed opportunities for AI-assisted engagement. The chapter concludes by identifying future research directions to maximise the democratic potential of AI-assisted participation while embedding ethical safeguards to counteract the reproduction of linguistic inequalities.