Track papers across labs, topics, and trends.
Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This study investigates the relationship between prior LLM experience and perceptions of AI ethics among 93 bioscience graduate and postdoctoral trainees. By comparing self-reported usage frequency, self-rated familiarity, and prior AI education, the authors find that usage frequency correlates significantly with key perception outcomes, while prior education shows no such associations. The findings highlight the potential for leveraging simple behavioral signals to enhance adaptive AI ethics instruction, indicating that LLM engagement may be a more reliable indicator of readiness than traditional educational metrics.
Self-reported LLM usage frequency is a stronger predictor of AI ethics perception than prior coursework or workshops.
Adaptive AI ethics instruction in graduate research training benefits from intake measures that reflect differences in prior LLM experience. Prior coursework or workshop attendance is an obvious candidate, but it is not clear whether it is associated with pre-instruction ratings on key AI perception items. We compare three candidate intake features, self-reported usage frequency, self-rated LLM familiarity, and prior AI education, across five baseline perception outcomes in 93 bioscience graduate and postdoctoral trainees enrolled in a required research ethics course. Usage frequency shows Holm-corrected associations with all five outcomes, self-rated familiarity with three, and prior AI education with none. A threshold-like pattern at the lower end of the scale is most visible for training interest and accuracy trust rather than appearing as a uniform gradient across all five outcomes. In a short intake survey, reported LLM use is more consistently associated with these perceptions than prior coursework or workshops, with self-rated familiarity serving as a secondary indicator. These results suggest that simple pre-instruction behavioral signals can inform lightweight intake profiling for adaptive AI ethics education.