Track papers across labs, topics, and trends.
Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This study investigates the implications of integrating autonomous drones into firefighting operations, focusing on how they influence accountability within emergency response teams. Through two real-life field trials, the research identifies significant uncertainties in accountability attribution, particularly due to the drones' roles in hierarchical structures and the emergence of novel human-drone interactions. The findings highlight the need for clear frameworks and recommendations to ensure that the deployment of these technologies does not compromise accountability in critical situations.
Uncertainty about drone roles in firefighting teams can lead to accountability confusion, risking effective emergency response.
There is a growing research field exploring how autonomous drones can enhance emergency response effectiveness. Integrating these (artificial) agents into existing emergency teams and workflows may significantly impact established accountability relationships. This paper examines how autonomous drones affect accountability attribution within complex socio-technical systems. Drawing on two real-life field trials in firefighting, the study reveals substantial uncertainty around accountability when drones are organizationally deployed. Using Bovens' accountability framework, two challenges are identified: (1) uncertainty about the role of drones within hierarchical structures, leading to confused accountability ascriptions; and (2) new forms of human-drone interactions introducing additional accountability-relevant issues. Based on these insights, the paper proposes actionable recommendations to support the responsible integration of autonomous drones into firefighting operations without undermining accountability. These findings offer practical guidance for policymakers and contribute to further research on accountability in autonomous systems.