Track papers across labs, topics, and trends.
Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces SMAA-Fair, an extension of Stochastic Multicriteria Acceptability Analysis (SMAA) that integrates fairness considerations into ranking processes. By reweighting simulated rankings based on group fairness metrics, such as Statistical Parity and Kullback-Leibler divergence, the method enhances the representation of protected groups in the resulting rankings. Numerical experiments demonstrate that SMAA-Fair not only improves fairness in rankings but also maintains robustness against preference uncertainty, making it a significant advancement in fair decision-making frameworks.
Fairness-aware rankings can significantly elevate the representation of marginalized groups without sacrificing decision-making robustness.
Fairness has become a central concern in ranking problems involving individuals or social groups, particularly under the Responsible Artificial Intelligence agenda. In Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, Stochastic Multicriteria Acceptability Analysis (SMAA) provides a robust framework for handling uncertainty and incomplete preference information, but it does not explicitly address fairness in the resulting rankings. This paper proposes SMAA-Fair, a fairness-aware extension of SMAA for ranking problems. The approach reweights the simulated rankings generated by SMAA according to their level of group fairness, so that fairer rankings contribute more strongly to the acceptability indices and central weights vector. The framework is independent of the aggregation model and can incorporate different fairness metrics. In this study, Statistical Parity, normalized discounted Kullback--Leibler divergence (rKL) and normalized discounted cumulative Kullback--Leibler divergence (nDKL) are adopted. Rankings are derived from the fairness-adjusted acceptability matrix using expected ranking and maximum acceptability ranking. We also derive the central weight according to the degree of fairness in the obtained rankings. Numerical experiments with synthetic and real data show that SMAA-Fair improves the representation of protected groups among favourable ranking positions, while preserving robustness to preference uncertainty.