Track papers across labs, topics, and trends.
Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This study addresses the challenge of ratemaking for autonomous vehicle liability by employing a hierarchical Bayesian credibility framework that integrates data across varying operational design domains (ODDs), cities, and software versions. The authors demonstrate that utilizing a learned ODD-similarity kernel significantly enhances the accuracy of risk assessment compared to traditional methods, with credibility weights showing moderate pooling effects. Key findings indicate that partial pooling outperforms no pooling, and the advantages of the learned kernel become evident with data from around twelve deployed cities, highlighting its practical applicability in real-world scenarios.
Partial pooling of liability data across cities and software versions can dramatically improve risk assessment accuracy for autonomous vehicles, revealing the power of a learned ODD-similarity kernel.
Automated Driving System deployments create a foundational ratemaking challenge: sparse experience, shifting operational design domains, and non-stationary risk across software releases. We propose a hierarchical Bayesian credibility framework pooling across cities, software versions, and territories via a learned ODD-similarity kernel, nesting Buhlmann-Straub as a limiting case. Demonstrated on 648 verified-engaged Waymo crashes across four U.S. metros from the NHTSA Standing General Order database against 116 million matched miles, city-aggregate credibility weights are moderate (0.12-0.46), partial pooling decisively outperforms no pooling, and a power analysis shows the learned kernel's advantage becomes detectable at approximately twelve deployed cities.