Track papers across labs, topics, and trends.
Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper explores the concept of "weaponisation" in computing, where dominant ideals such as innovation and efficiency are repurposed to maintain the status quo and stifle critical discourse. Through collective autoethnography across various fields, the authors identify mechanisms that contribute to this phenomenon and propose a toolkit for "Reframing" that encourages practice-ready shifts towards more complex and just outcomes. The key result is a synthesis of recurring patterns of simplification and individualisation, along with actionable prompts that empower practitioners to challenge limiting narratives without needing formal authority.
Weaponisation of professional ideals in computing obscures alternatives, but a new reframing toolkit can empower practitioners to challenge the status quo and promote justice.
Computing's dominant concepts - innovation, efficiency, resilience, professionalism - often migrate from reflective ideals to instruments that limit behaviour, redirect responsibility, and foreclose critique. We call this drift weaponisation: the discursive repurposing of professional concepts so that they stabilise business-as-usual while making structural alternatives appear unreasonable, illegible, or out of scope. Using collective autoethnography across education, justice, public administration, research management, and computing, we identify recurring mechanisms (simplification, individualisation, binary framing, metric substitution, hero/resilience scripts, organised ignorance). From this synthesis we propose Reframing - peaceful, practice-ready shifts (e.g., From Simplified Slogans to Structural Literacy; From Performative Compliance to Meaningful Outcomes; From Coping to Justice) - each paired with a 'do-now' prompt. The levers restore complexity, surface assumptions, and redirect attention to structural conditions without requiring formal authority. We contribute: (1) a cross-field account of weaponisation as a patterned phenomenon; (2) a portable reframing toolkit grounded in narrative and systems thinking; and (3) implications for computing within limits, including day-to-day practice shifts toward care, sufficiency, and justice.