Track papers across labs, topics, and trends.
Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper critiques traditional custodial identity management by arguing that it relies on an outdated assumption of global simultaneity, which falters in complex digital ecosystems. By drawing a parallel to the shift from Newtonian to relativistic physics, the authors establish that identity should be viewed as a relational construct maintained through causally ordered exchanges rather than a static entity controlled by a central authority. The introduction of the autonomous principal as a reference frame for digital identity not only redefines sovereignty in data governance but also has significant implications for cross-border data flows and the development of agentic systems.
Identity management needs a radical rethink: it’s not about central authority but about relational dynamics between autonomous principals.
The 2023 paper \emph{Distributed Governance: a Principal-Agent Approach to Data Governance} arXiv:2308.07280 introduced the autonomous principal as the locus of transactional sovereignty in digital ecosystems. This follow-up, Part 2, advances a structural argument for why that model is not a normative preference but a consequence of taking causality seriously in distributed information systems. Drawing an analogy with the transition from Newtonian to relativistic physics, we show that custodial identity management rests on an implicit assumption of global simultaneity that fails as soon as identity must operate across ecosystems, jurisdictions, and the offline/online boundary. Once that assumption is dropped, state ceases to be a noun held by a central authority and becomes a relation maintained between principals through causally ordered exchanges. The autonomous principal emerges as the only entity with standing to define its own reference frame. We report on technology built since 2023 that operationalises this view, and outline its consequences for cross-border data flows and agentic systems.