Track papers across labs, topics, and trends.
Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This study investigates the propagation of deficiencies in brain connectome modalities using the Krakencoder simulation framework, analyzing structural and functional connectomes from 702 participants in the Human Connectome Project. By simulating the removal of individual functional networks, the research quantifies the impact on cross-modal predictions through KL divergence, Frobenius norm, and Wasserstein distance, revealing that the Default Mode Network causes the most significant perturbations. The results indicate that while sex-specific differences in network-level perturbations are subtle, intact connectomes provide substantially higher accuracy for sex classification compared to those derived from perturbations, highlighting the importance of complete data for accurate predictions.
Full connectomes outperform perturbation-derived signatures in sex classification accuracy by nearly 20%, underscoring the critical role of intact network data.
This study examines how deficiencies in one brain connectome modality propagate to the other, using the Krakencoder as a simulation framework. Structural and functional connectomes from 702 healthy participants in the Human Connectome Project were analyzed, with the impact of each of the Yeo-7 functional networks assessed separately. Seven scenarios were considered, each involving the removal of a single network while the remaining networks were preserved. The resulting perturbations in cross-modal predictions were quantified using three complementary metrics: KL divergence on eigenvalue spectra, Frobenius norm, and Wasserstein distance. In addition, the persistence of sex-specific information within the predicted connectomes was evaluated. Across all metrics and both prediction directions, the Default Mode Network produced the largest perturbations, whereas the Somatomotor network yielded the smallest. Sex differences in network-level perturbation signatures were subtle, with the best result being an accuracy of 66.09% from connectomes predicted under network-removal conditions. In contrast, connectomes predicted from intact inputs achieved substantially higher sex classification accuracy, reaching up to 84.76%. These findings confirm that full predicted connectomes retain considerably more sex-discriminative information than perturbation-derived signatures alone.