Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces IVIE, a neuro-symbolic framework for generating interactive fiction worlds that leverages the strengths of both Large Language Models (LLMs) and symbolic systems. By employing a four-stage incremental generation pipeline, IVIE allows LLMs to handle creative aspects such as setting and character creation while ensuring world coherence through symbolic validation. Human evaluations demonstrate that IVIE produces immersive and thematically coherent worlds, achieving a balance between creative flexibility and narrative consistency, although some limitations in LLM reliability and validation remain.
IVIE achieves a groundbreaking balance between creative freedom and narrative coherence in interactive fiction, generating engaging worlds that maintain structural integrity.
Computational creativity in Interactive Fiction faces a fundamental tension: Large Language Models (LLM) may produce creative narratives but struggle with world coherence, while symbolic systems ensure consistency but lack creative flexibility. We present IVIE (Incremental&Validated Interactive Experiences), a neuro-symbolic approach to generating complete and playable interactive fiction worlds from scratch. Building upon PAYADOR's neuro-symbolic framework, IVIE implements a four-stage incremental generation pipeline that delegates creative decisions--setting and character creation, puzzle design--to LLMs while grounding the world state through symbolic validation. The system generates worlds with interconnected locations, functional items, non-player characters, and coherent puzzles, all structured around a central goal-oriented architecture. Human evaluation shows the approach generates immersive, thematically coherent worlds with high player engagement. Results seem to indicate that the neuro-symbolic approach successfully balances flexibility with narrative coherence: symbolic validation grounds LLM generation without eliminating generative freedom. However, challenges remain: LLM inconsistencies occasionally bypass puzzle constraints, and objective validation gaps allow some structurally impossible goals. We identify key design considerations for future neurosymbolic interactive storytelling systems, particularly regarding LLM capabilities and their limitations.