Track papers across labs, topics, and trends.
Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This study investigates how humor style and joke content influence the perception of robot-delivered jokes in bilingual group settings. By employing a mixed factorial design, the researchers found that humor type significantly affects perceived funniness, with Aggressive and Affiliative styles rated more favorably, while person-related jokes were deemed more appropriate than political ones. Additionally, participants' language preferences were influenced by their fluency and humor practices, highlighting the complexity of humor in human-robot interactions.
Aggressive and Affiliative humor styles can significantly enhance the funniness of robot-delivered jokes, while political content risks appropriateness.
Humor plays a central role in human social relationships, and recent advances in computational humor create new opportunities for integrating humor into human-robot interaction (HRI). While large language models (LLMs) can generate diverse forms of humor, it remains unclear how humor style, joke content, and language preference shape perceptions of robot-delivered humor in group settings. In this exploratory study, we employed a mixed factorial design in which participants evaluated AI-generated jokes delivered by a robot in a university classroom. We examined the effects of humor type (Affiliative, Self-Enhancing, Aggressive, Self-Defeating) and joke content (person-related vs. political) on perceived funniness and appropriateness, as well as preferred language. Results show that humor type significantly influences funniness, with Aggressive and Affiliative humor rated higher, while joke content primarily affects appropriateness, with person-related jokes preferred over political ones. Language preference was shaped by both joke content and participants'self-reported fluency and humor practices.