Track papers across labs, topics, and trends.
Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This study investigates human-AI collaborative writing through a gamified exercise where participants must resist AI-generated suggestions in a dystopian setting. By analyzing the responses of 74 participants, the research reveals the conditions under which individuals prioritize creative autonomy over AI assistance, highlighting the tension between efficiency and authenticity in AI-augmented creativity. Key findings indicate that users often default to AI suggestions despite explicit disincentives, raising important questions about the implications for individual voice in AI-assisted creation.
Participants frequently succumbed to AI suggestions even when incentivized to maintain their creative autonomy, challenging assumptions about human-AI collaboration.
The rapid proliferation of large language models (LLMs) raises critical questions about human creativity and individual expression in an era of AI-assisted creation. When do humans adopt AI suggestions, and what are the implications for individual voice? This study examines these questions through a gamified writing exercise where 74 participants (214 responses) replied to prompts while AI-generated word suggestions were available as they wrote. The game simulates a dystopian future in which an AI is attempting to learn from what remains of human individuality, and disincentivizes AI-like writing. In doing so, it attempts to create conditions that reveal authentic user preferences rather than default behaviors, such as accepting a readily available AI-generated suggestion. Note that this is a deliberate inversion of the "helpful assistant" design pattern; the system is explicitly forbidding you from accepting AI suggestions. We analyze user behavior patterns across different task types, user behaviors, and response characteristics to understand the factors influencing human-AI interaction in creative tasks. The study focuses on when users choose to maintain creative autonomy versus violating the rules of the game and accepting AI assistance. It also explores how these choices relate to response patterns, task characteristics, and user behavior. This gamified approach offers both a framework for studying authentic human-AI interaction and a provocative lens for understanding the tension between efficiency and authenticity in AI-augmented creativity.