Track papers across labs, topics, and trends.
Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper addresses the optimal control of microgrids under uncertainties by proposing two formulations for the sizing and power scheduling problem, incorporating logical constraints related to energy storage systems. The first formulation employs a mixed-integer linear programming approach, while the second utilizes a continuous nonlinear programming method with an exact smooth reformulation of the constraints. The authors introduce a novel local reduction algorithm to solve both formulations, achieving over 90% feasibility rates in their evaluations using extensive Monte Carlo simulations.
Achieving over 90% feasibility in optimal microgrid control under uncertainty could revolutionize energy management strategies.
The problem of optimal sizing and power scheduling in microgrids subject to uncertainties is well known to the control community. Commonly, the optimal control problem is cast as a mixed-integer program to model the logical constraints arising in energy storage systems, and is then solved approximately using numerical methods such as the scenario approach. In this paper, we propose and compare two formulations of a robust microgrid sizing and power scheduling optimal control problem with logical constraints and uncertainties in the user's power demand, solar power generation, grid electricity prices and battery efficiencies. The first formulation uses binary variables and big-M constraints, leading to a mixed-integer linear program. The second formulation casts the problem as a continuous nonlinear program through an exact smooth reformulation of the logical constraints, consisting of additional modelling variables and non-convex constraints. We then propose a novel local reduction algorithm, extending an existing method, to solve both problems. The two formulations are compared by evaluating the solutions returned by local reduction using 100,000-sample Monte Carlo simulations and achieve promising results, with both averaging feasibility rates above 90%.