Track papers across labs, topics, and trends.
Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces a five-plane reference architecture designed for the runtime governance of production AI agents, addressing the inadequacies of existing policy engines that fail to manage the risks posed by these agents operating within workflows. By implementing a structured approach that includes a reasoning plane and four enforcement planes, the architecture allows for stateful evaluations against composite principals, effectively mitigating risks associated with unauthorized transformations of business processes. The authors demonstrate the architecture's effectiveness by foreclosing seven production-agent threats across five workflows, achieving rapid adjudication times and ensuring evidence integrity through a robust audit substrate.
A novel governance architecture for AI agents reveals how to manage risks that traditional security models overlook, ensuring compliance even in complex workflows.
Enterprise security was built to govern data boundaries: the protected surface was data at rest and in transit, and the controls -- access control, data-loss prevention, perimeter inspection -- governed crossings of that boundary. Production AI agents dissolve this assumption. An agent reads context, calls tools, invokes connectors, and modifies systems of record on an enterprise's behalf, so risk moves inside the workflow, into sequences of individually-permitted actions that may transform a business process no one authorized. Existing policy engines do not extend to this regime: they evaluate request-time decisions against atomic principals, where agentic systems require stateful evaluation against composite principals whose authority attenuates through delegation chains. We present a reference architecture for the runtime governance of production agents, built from four composable primitives: a five-plane decomposition (a reasoning plane that adjudicates intent, and four enforcement planes -- network, identity, endpoint, data -- that realize the decision), stop-anywhere mediation, composite principals with capability attenuation, and audit as a structured evidence substrate. We define a taxonomy of six interruption primitives that generalize allow and deny, state and argue for four correctness invariants, and demonstrate the foreclosure of seven production-agent threats across five concrete workflows. A reference implementation of the policy-engine core supplies measured evidence: attenuation correctness and evidence reconstructability hold on every trial, adjudication runs in single-digit microseconds, and the audit substrate's tamper-evidence behaves exactly as designed. We are explicit about scope: the architecture governs delegated action, not model behavior, and a full-system evaluation against a live agent benchmark is the invited next step.