Track papers across labs, topics, and trends.
Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper investigates the role of uncertainty quantification in machine learning models for predicting intrinsic magnetic properties and coercivity in permanent magnets. By benchmarking classical and modern approaches, the authors highlight the effectiveness of Gaussian negative log-likelihood loss and dropout-based Bayesian approximation in improving model reliability. The key finding is that uncertainty quantification significantly enhances prediction trustworthiness and can be effectively transferred across different modeling tasks, thus broadening its applicability in materials science.
Uncertainty quantification can transform how we predict material properties, enhancing model reliability and enabling cross-task applicability.
Machine learning is increasingly applied to accelerate the discovery of novel materials by exploring large compositional and structural design spaces. Yet, the scarcity of high-quality data and the frequent need for out-of-distribution prediction introduce substantial uncertainty, making the assessment of model reliability essential. In this work, we investigate uncertainty quantification as a means to evaluate model confidence in the context of permanent magnet research. In a first study, we benchmark classical and modern machine learning models for predicting intrinsic magnetic properties, focusing on the quality of their uncertainty estimates. We apply Gaussian negative log-likelihood loss and dropout-based Bayesian approximation as practical strategies for estimating predictive uncertainty. In a second study, we transfer these architectural features for uncertainty estimation to a more complex task: predicting coercivity from microstructural information using a graph neural network. Together, these studies demonstrate that uncertainty quantification not only enhances the trustworthiness of predictions but is also transferable across different modeling tasks.