Track papers across labs, topics, and trends.
Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This study investigates the effectiveness of AI disclosures in newsrooms, revealing that current practices—either brief labels or detailed disclosures—fail to enhance reader trust. Through a controlled experiment with 34 news readers, it was found that detailed disclosures can lead to a "transparency dilemma," where trust diminishes instead of increases, while one-line disclosures create an information gap. The research highlights a disconnect between journalists' perceptions of responsible disclosure and readers' actual needs, suggesting that user-centered design approaches could better address transparency in AI involvement in news.
Detailed AI disclosures may backfire, eroding trust instead of fostering it, while simpler labels leave readers searching for clarity.
As newsrooms integrate generative AI, journalists face a disclosure challenge: how to communicate AI involvement in ways that maintain reader trust. Current practice offers two approaches: brief one-line labels or detailed disclosures specifying human oversight, editorial accountability, and error reporting mechanisms. Neither achieves journalists' goal of building trust through transparency. An existing controlled experiment with 34 news readers show that detailed disclosures trigger a \textit{transparency dilemma}, reducing trust rather than increasing it, and risk introducing dark patterns that readers scroll past with the illusion of transparency. One-line disclosures avoid this effect but can create an information gap, prompting readers to expend cognitive effort searching for signs of AI involvement that the disclosure indicates but does not explain. Yet readers are not rejecting transparency, they proposed disclosure designs centered on user agency: detail-on-demand interactions, proportional AI-ratio visualizations, outlet-level signals, and explicit "no AI" labels. I argue that this disconnect between what practitioners believe is responsible disclosure and what users actually need is a design problem for the HCI community.