Track papers across labs, topics, and trends.
Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
The Internet Quality Barometer (IQB) framework was developed to convert raw Internet measurement data into a single, interpretable score that reflects overall Internet quality across various use cases. By mapping speed test measurements to network requirements and aggregating performance into a composite IQB score, the framework allows for meaningful comparisons of Internet quality across different locations. A preliminary sensitivity analysis revealed the parameters most influential on IQB scores, identifying potential outliers and areas for improvement in the framework's design and application.
The IQB framework reveals how nuanced parameter choices can significantly skew Internet quality assessments, potentially misleading stakeholders.
The Internet Quality Barometer (IQB) framework was designed to transform raw Internet measurement data into actionable insights about Internet quality. Specifically, the framework maps raw speed test measurements to network requirements (e.g., throughput, latency), maps these requirements to representative Internet use cases (such as video streaming or web browsing), and finally aggregates performance across use cases into a single IQB score. The IQB score is a composite index ranging from 0 to 1, intended to capture overall Internet quality in a way that is both interpretable and comparable across locations. We implemented the IQB framework in practice by developing an open-source IQB library and a prototype web application. These tools enabled us to compute IQB scores at scale, including global estimates aggregated at the level of countries, regions, and cities. In this report we conduct a preliminary sensitivity analysis of the IQB framework, investigating how different parameter choices affect the resulting IQB scores, identifying which parameters the framework is most sensitive to, and highlighting cases that may lead to outliers or potentially misleading results.