Track papers across labs, topics, and trends.
Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper models the impact of AI-accelerated vulnerability discovery on interconnected systems using a queueing and network-theoretic approach. The findings reveal that when the rate of discovered vulnerabilities surpasses the capacity for remediation, backlogs can escalate rapidly, leading to increased systemic risk. Notably, in hub-dominated networks, segmentation proves more effective at mitigating compromise propagation than merely increasing remediation speed, suggesting that a dual strategy of automation and reduced coupling offers the best defense.
When AI discovers vulnerabilities faster than we can remediate them, systemic risk escalates nonlinearly, challenging traditional defense strategies.
Advanced AI systems for code analysis, binary analysis, fuzzing orchestration, and penetration-test planningmay significantly increase the rate at which latent vulnerabilities are discovered. While improved discovery can benefit defenders, it can also overload remediation pipelines and accelerate adversarial weaponization. This paper develops a queueing and network-theoretic model of AI-accelerated vulnerability discovery in interconnected systems. We represent an enterprise as a weighted dependency graph with replenishing vulnerability pools, finite remediation capacity, triage degradation, exploit window compression, and dynamic compromise propagation. We derive stability conditions for vulnerability backlogs, formulate a dynamic coupling between unresolved backlog and cascade risk, and evaluate mitigation strategies through simulation. Results indicate that when actionable discovery arrivals exceed remediation throughput, backlogs grow rapidly and systemic risk increases nonlinearly. In hub-dominated topologies, segmentation can reduce propagated compromise more effectively than remediation speed alone, while the strongest defense combines remediation automation with reduced network coupling.