Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper explores the political economy of graphics card miniaturization through a four-year research-creation inquiry, emphasizing the need to demystify the sociotechnical entanglements of GPUs in AI. By conducting fieldwork with liquid nitrogen overclockers in Taiwan and urban miners in Ghana, the author employs critical methodologies to investigate the implications of GPU technology on energy management and environmental sustainability. The findings reveal how research-creation methods can effectively illuminate the often opaque materialities of AI systems, contributing to a deeper understanding of their socio-environmental impacts.
Rethinking GPUs reveals their hidden socio-environmental impacts, challenging our understanding of AI's material foundations.
This contribution follows a four-year investigation (2022--2026) into the political economy of graphics card miniaturization. It begins from the premise that rethinking our relationship to artificial intelligence and its sociotechnical entanglements requires demystifying and opening the black box of this technical object. Within our algorithmic culture, the graphics card (GPU) enables the massive, parallel processing of large datasets, making possible the training of the models that underpin our intelligent systems. GPU miniaturization is equally crucial: as a key driver of the Internet of Things, this sociotechnical phenomenon enables the inclusion of these cards in increasingly compact and powerful systems while also enabling better management of energy resources. The development of these everyday objects and technologies nevertheless reinforces several major problems. Drawing on both the social sciences and the critical, reflexive, speculative, and fictional methodologies of research-creation, the author developed several investigative fieldwork sites -- among liquid nitrogen overclockers in Taiwan and urban miners in Ghana -- and conducted situated experimentations on some fifty acquired graphics cards. Structured around three themes (dismantle and dissolve, rebuild, remix), this paper demonstrates how research-creation methods constitute full epistemologies for apprehending what seems a priori external, opaque, or inaccessible, and for restoring artificial intelligence to its tangible materialities. In doing so, it contributes to the field of ICT for sustainability by affirming research-creation as a rigorous means of disentangling the material and environmental infrastructures that computational systems both depend on and obscure.