Track papers across labs, topics, and trends.
Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces a novel method for Velocity Planning (VP) in autonomous racing that adapts in real-time to changing conditions by inferring a continuous scaling factor from vehicle stability rather than directly estimating the Tire-Road Friction Coefficient (TRFC). This innovative approach allows for the generation of a continuous friction map that effectively captures tire-road interactions and control inaccuracies, leading to more precise target speed calculations. The method was validated on a real Formula Student race car, achieving a remarkable 35% improvement in lap times over ten laps compared to traditional methods, with an average speed increase of 8% over a non-adaptive approach.
A continuous stability-aware velocity planning method boosts autonomous racing performance, cutting lap times by 35% and enhancing speed adaptability.
In autonomous racing, especially in competitions such as Formula Student Driverless, precise planning of the target velocity of a race car is crucial for competitive lap times and stable driving behavior. Especially at high speeds, Velocity Planning (VP) is a significant challenge as it has to be performed in real time, taking into account track layouts, environmental influences, mechanical tolerances, and the resulting control inaccuracies. In this paper, we present a novel approach to VP that dynamically adapts to such changing conditions. Instead of estimating the physical Tire-Road Friction Coefficient (TRFC), a continuous scaling factor is inferred indirectly from vehicle stability. This factor not only reflects the effective tire-road interaction but also captures effects of control inaccuracies. From this, we generate a continuous friction map, which serves as a robust, adaptive basis for computing the optimal target speed, accounting for both vehicle and environmental limits. Our proposed approach was evaluated on a real Formula Student race car, showing a lap time improvement of 35 % over ten laps and an average increase of 8 % compared to a non-adaptive approach.