Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper reconceptualizes blockchain systems by applying records management principles from ISO 15489-1:2016, framing transactions as records and introducing a seven-stage lifecycle for blockchain data. By analyzing Bitcoin and a non-fungible token through this lens, the authors argue that blockchain systems should be viewed not just as transactional infrastructures but as complex record management systems. The findings highlight the implications of lifecycle visibility on governance and regulatory challenges, particularly in the context of crypto-crime research.
Blockchain systems are fundamentally record management systems, not just transactional platforms, with significant implications for governance and regulation.
Current blockchain research and analytics tend to prioritize observable on-chain transactions, obscuring the processes through which cryptocurrencies are created, publicised, retained, and disposed of. In response, this paper considers distributed ledger technologies from records management principles in ISO 15489-1:2016. Setting off by specifying the parallels -- that is transactions as "records", crypto-asset units as "information assets", and blockchains as "aggregations" -- we introduce a seven-stage lifecycle for blockchain data. We apply the framework to Bitcoin, a fungible token, and a non-fungible token. On this basis, we argue that blockchain systems are not merely transactional infrastructures but record management systems with distinctive characteristics. We discuss how the on-chain/off-chain boundary and privacy-enhancing technologies can complicate lifecycle visibility, with particular relevance for crypto-crime research and investigation. As a meta-level framework, the lifecycle perspective enables positioning existing research, decomposing legal, regulatory, technological, and operational challenges by stage, and informing lifecycle-aware approaches to blockchain governance, analytics, and regulation.