Track papers across labs, topics, and trends.
Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper conducts a systematic literature review on Self-Explainability (SX) in self-adaptive and self-organising systems, aiming to clarify the current state of research and establish a unified definition and taxonomy. The findings reveal that while many approaches to SX exist, they are predominantly conceptual with limited practical applications, and there is a significant lack of standardized evaluation methods. By introducing Levels of Self-Explainability, this work lays the groundwork for future research and practical advancements in making complex AI systems more understandable and trustworthy.
Most self-explainability approaches in AI are still theoretical, with few practical implementations, revealing a critical gap in the field.
The growing complexity of self-adaptive and self-organising systems, fuelled by advances in Artificial Intelligence (AI), has made them increasingly difficult to understand and trust. While Explainable AI aims to provide insight into AI decision-making, a more advanced goal is for systems to explain themselves - an ability referred to as Self-Explainability (SX). This article presents a systematic literature review on SX, analysing existing approaches, including their domains, targets, and evaluation methods. The review develops a unified definition and taxonomy of SX and introduces Levels of Self-Explainability, providing a framework for positioning current and future research. Our results show that most SX approaches remain conceptual, with few practical implementations. Moreover, there is currently no formal or de facto standard for evaluating SX, highlighting a major research gap. This work thus establishes a foundation and roadmap for advancing Self-Explainability in complex systems.