Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces WeaveBench, a comprehensive benchmark designed to evaluate computer-use agents (CUAs) in hybrid interfaces that integrate visual desktop control and command-line execution. By assessing 114 tasks across eight real-world domains, the authors highlight the inadequacies of existing benchmarks that treat interface capabilities in isolation, revealing that current models achieve a maximum PassRate of only 41.2%. The study emphasizes the need for more rigorous evaluation methods, as the trajectory-aware judge shows that traditional outcome-only assessments significantly inflate perceived agent performance.
Current models struggle with hybrid interface tasks, achieving only a 41.2% success rate, underscoring a critical gap in CUA evaluation.
Computer-use agents (CUAs) increasingly operate in runtimes that combine visual desktop control, command-line execution, code editing, browsers, and external tools. Existing benchmarks, however, often evaluate these interfaces as separable capabilities, leaving long-horizon cross-interface orchestration under-tested. Thus, we introduce WeaveBench, a long-horizon hybrid-interface benchmark with 114 tasks across 8 real-world work domains, grounded in real user requests and publicly verifiable artifacts. Each task requires agents to combine GUI observations/actions with CLI/code operations within a single trajectory. We evaluate these tasks on a real Ubuntu desktop inside deployed CLI-agent runtimes, augmented with a minimal desktop-control plugin. We also propose a companion trajectory-aware judge that inspects deliverables, files, screenshots, logs, and action traces, while detecting shortcut behaviors such as fabricated visual evidence or hard-coded metrics. Across frontier model-runtime pairings, the best PassRate reaches only 41.2%, showing the benchmark remains far from saturated. The trajectory-aware judge further reveals that outcome-only grading substantially overestimates agent performance. Overall, WeaveBench exposes a critical gap in CUA evaluation and provides an effective testbed to measure whether agents can orchestrate GUI, CLI, and code operations across long-horizon real-world tasks.