Track papers across labs, topics, and trends.
Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper critiques existing reference-free faithfulness metrics in grounded generation, highlighting their focus on precision at the expense of coverage. By leveraging Formula 1 telemetry, the authors introduce a novel evaluation framework that measures both precision and recall, revealing that leading models often fail to cover essential facts. Their findings indicate that prioritizing coverage can significantly reorder model rankings and improve overall performance, as demonstrated across multilingual benchmarks and a second complete-oracle domain.
Coverage-aware evaluation reveals that top models often miss critical information, challenging the reliance on precision alone in grounded generation assessments.
Reference-free faithfulness metrics verify each atomic claim a model makes against ground truth, and are increasingly used to evaluate grounded generation. We show they share a blind spot: they measure only precision -- are the stated claims supported? -- and therefore reward abstention, since a model can score near-perfect faithfulness by saying almost nothing. We make this measurable using Formula 1 telemetry, a domain where strategic ground truth is derived deterministically and, crucially, completely: for each decision we know the full set of facts that mattered. This completeness -- absent in open-domain faithfulness benchmarks -- lets us measure recall (coverage of the relevant facts) exactly, alongside precision. On a multilingual (EN/ES/PT) benchmark of 7,253 decision instances spanning 150 races, the most precise frontier model covers under half of the relevant facts and ranks last by F1, so requiring coverage reorders the systems; the same effect reappears in a second complete-oracle domain (NOAA weather forecasts). A prompt ablation shows the low coverage is not an under-prompting artifact: explicitly asking models to be thorough does not close the gap. We pair faithfulness with coverage into a single score, validate the metric (controlled perturbation; agreement across a model-free regex extractor and a cross-family LLM extractor, system-level Spearman 1.0), and give a verifier-guided generation method that improves precision and recall without references. We release the benchmark, structured annotations, metric, baselines, and an interactive demo.