Track papers across labs, topics, and trends.
Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces Sign-Gated On-Policy Distillation (SG-OPD), which enhances on-policy distillation by addressing the limitations of trajectory-level alignment and token-level reliability between student and teacher models. By employing a binary verifier for trust signaling and implementing phased teacher sampling alongside a sign-consistency gate, SG-OPD achieves significant performance improvements. Experimental results demonstrate that SG-OPD outperforms standard on-policy distillation methods, achieving average gains of 1.98 and 7.50 on competition-level mathematical reasoning benchmarks.
SG-OPD achieves remarkable gains in mathematical reasoning by effectively aligning student and teacher models through innovative trust signaling techniques.
On-policy distillation (OPD) trains a student on its own trajectories with dense per-token supervision from a stronger teacher, and often outperforms off-policy distillation and standard reinforcement learning. However, we find that its effectiveness implicitly relies on two assumptions that frequently break in practice: trajectory-level alignment between the student and the teacher, and uniform token-level reliability of the teacher's preferences. We therefore propose Sign-Gated On-Policy Distillation (SG-OPD), which uses a binary verifier as a trust signal for the teacher at two complementary granularities: phased teacher sampling mixes in verifier-endorsed teacher rollouts at cold-start, and a sign-consistency gate extrapolates the distillation update on tokens where the teacher agrees with the verifier-correct direction and interpolates it where it disagrees. Experiments on competition-level mathematical reasoning benchmarks show that SG-OPD consistently outperforms standard OPD, with average gains of 1.98 and 7.50 at the per-sample and per-question levels, respectively.