Track papers across labs, topics, and trends.
Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces a probabilistic framework for quantifying uncertainty in deformable image registration (DIR) during radiotherapy dose propagation, addressing the significant impact of deformation uncertainty on dose estimates. By modeling voxel correspondence as a random variable influenced by a local certainty map, the framework generates interpretable metrics such as dose probabilities and confidence bounds while maintaining computational efficiency. The findings reveal that the design of the certainty map significantly influences dose and dose-volume histogram (DVH) uncertainty, highlighting the importance of modeling choices in radiotherapy assessments.
Uncertainty in deformable image registration can drastically skew radiotherapy dose estimates, but a new probabilistic framework offers clear, interpretable metrics to navigate this challenge.
Deformable image registration (DIR) is widely used in radiotherapy for dose propagation and accumulation, but uncertainty in the underlying deformation can substantially affect clinically relevant dose estimates. We present a practical probabilistic framework for propagating DIR uncertainty to voxel-wise dose statistics and dose-volume histograms (DVHs). The method models the mapped correspondence at each voxel as a random variable governed by a transparent local certainty map that can be defined by simple safety margins, structure-boundary mismatch, or structure-wise conservative uncertainty values. This yields interpretable quantities such as dose probabilities, expected dose, confidence bounds, and induced DVH envelopes. The framework is designed to remain lightweight and interpretable: it avoids complex biomechanical or ensemble-based uncertainty models and instead emphasizes simple parameterization, computational feasibility, and transparent dose metrics. We further introduce a structure-guided in/out strategy as an optional refinement that restricts mapping probabilities to anatomically plausible target regions. The approach is demonstrated on a prostate radiotherapy case study and used to compare different certainty-map strategies and probability kernels. The experiments show that the certainty-map design has a stronger effect on resulting dose and DVH uncertainty bounds than the specific kernel choice, while the additional benefit of the in/out strategy is case-dependent and modest in the present example. Overall, the proposed framework provides a transparent way to incorporate DIR uncertainty into radiotherapy dose assessment and to study how modelling choices affect propagated dose metrics.